Investing in Forests
Renewable and carbon-neutral biomass energy creates jobs, combats climate change, and keeps forests as forests. Viable biomass energy markets support America’s private forests, which employ 2.5 million Americans—especially in rural parts of the country—and contribute $115 billion to the economy each year. Viable biomass energy markets also allow foresters to maintain the health and sustainability of forests—and importantly, keep forests as forests, allowing them to sequester greenhouse gases from the atmosphere through the natural carbon cycle. Furthermore, a robust biomass energy industry provides a domestic source of clean, renewable energy that can help us combat climate change and gain our energy independence. In the Resources section of this website, you can find information on the economic, energy, and environmental benefits of biomass energy and viable biomass energy markets.Last summer, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed to treat biomass emissions the same as fossil fuel emissions under the Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule. This rule would have reversed well-established policy, including the EPA’s own policy, recognizing that forest biomass recycles carbon from the atmosphere through tree growth and is an important means of reducing carbon in the atmosphere. The Tailoring Rule’s treatment of biomass would have had numerous unintended consequences on the economy as well as the renewable energy and climate change goals. After much criticism, the EPA decided to defer the treatment of biomass under the Tailoring Rule for three years, pending further consideration of the science and a subsequent rulemaking on the issue. It is important that supporters for renewable biomass energy stay engaged in the process to document the ecological benefits of renewable biomass energy.
Please examine our resources on biomass and take action to support U.S. jobs, U.S. forests, and domestic, renewable, clean energy. It’s important that we work together to grow America’s energy and forests.
read moreResources
What is biomass energy?
- Biomass Overview Q&A
- The Case for Renewable Forest Biomass Energy Briefing Book
- Why A Broad Definition of Renewable Forest Biomass?
Is biomass energy carbon neutral and renewable?
- The Benefits of Renewable Forest Biomass Energy
- Mitigation Benefits of Working Forests
- White Paper: Carbon Neutrality of Energy from Forest Biomass
- NCASI: Biomass Carbon Neutrality
What are the benefits of healthy, private, working forests?
- Benefits of Healthy Forests
- Economic Impact of Private Forests
- Forisk: Three Realities of Wood Bioenergy and Forest Owners
- Rethink Forests: An Educational Website on How Managed Forests Address Climate Change
What is the outlook for biomass energy markets and ecological sustainability?
- White Paper: Assurance of Long-Term Sustainable Biomass Energy
- White Paper: Environmental Regulation of Private Forests in the U.S.
- NCASI: Ecological Sustainability of Biomass Utilization
- Forisk: Predicting Future Capacity for Biomass for Energy
- Forest2Market: Biomass Supply/Demand/Pricing
What is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule?
- EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule Fact Sheet
- CORIMM: Unintended Consequences of the Tailoring Rule’s Treatment of Biomass: full study and one-page paper
- Forisk: Economic and Regional Impact Analysis of the Treatment of Biomass Energy Under the EPA Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule: full study, one-page paper, and more information
- EPA’s Deferral of the Tailoring Rule
- EPA’s Letter to NAFO
Letters Supporting Biomass Energy and Opposing EPA’s Tailoring Rule
- 113 scientists supporting the carbon benefits of biomass energy
- Letters to EPA Administrator Jackson supporting removing biomass energy emissions from the GHG Tailoring Rule: U.S. Senators, U.S. Representatives, U.S. Senators Baucus and Merkley, and Coalition
- Letter to EPA Administrator Jackson supporting a new rulemaking and a stay on implementing the biomass provisions of the Tailoring Rule: U.S. House
- Letter from Secretary Vilsack Supporting a Farm Bill Definition (PDF)
NAFO’s Official Comments on Renewable Energy
- Proposed Rule for Deferral of CO2 Emissions from Bioenergy and Other Biogenic Sources under the PSD and Title V Programs (PDF) – May 5, 2011
- Statement: Proposed Rule for Deferral of CO2 Emissions from Bioenergy and Other Biogenic Sources under the PSD and Title V Programs – April 5, 2011
- NSPS Listening Session Comments (PDF) – March 18, 2011
- Biofuels and the Environment: First Triennial Report to Congress (PDF) – February 28, 2011
- Tailoring Rule Best Available Control Technology (BACT) Guidance (PDF) – December 1, 2010
- Massachusetts Draft Proposed Regulation: Renewable Portfolio Standard – Biomass Policy Regulatory Process (PDF) – October 21, 2010
- Response to Louisiana PSC Definition of Woody Biomass Suggested by Commissioner Field (PDF) – October 6, 2010
- Proposed Settlement related to Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases (PDF) – September 27, 2010
- Response to Center for Biological Diversity’s Request for Correction of Information Disseminated by the EPA Regarding Emissions from Biomass Combustion (PDF) – September 23, 2010
- Senate Agriculture Committee oversight hearing on EPA (PDF) – September 23, 2010
- Louisiana PSC – re-study of the feasibility of a RPS for the State of Louisiana (PDF) – September 20, 2010
- EPA’s Call for Information on the carbon benefits of biomass energy (PDF) – September 13, 2010
- Boiler MACT (PDF) – August 23, 2010
- BCAP Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PDF) – August 16, 2010
- EPA: Identification on Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials that are Solid Waste (PDF) – August 3, 2010
- Manomet Study on Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy (PDF) – July 10, 2010
- National Research Council study of current and projected biofuel product, use, and impacts – April 15, 2010
- EPA: Changes to Renewable Fuel Standards Program – September 25, 2009
- Hearing to review the impact of the indirect land use and renewable biomass provisions in the renewable fuel standard in the House Agricluture Committee – May 6, 2009
- Hearing on the Environmental Protection Agency’s Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) in the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, Subcommittee on Clean Air and Nuclear Safety – April 1, 2009
- Hearing on a Majority Staff Draft for a Renewable Electricity Standard (RES) Proposal in the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources – February 10, 2009
Take Action
Support Biomass Energy by Commenting on the EPA’s Proposed Deferral Rule
The public has until May 5th to comment on EPA’s proposed rule to defer the regulation of biomass greenhouse gas emissions from the Clean Air Act. NAFO is preparing extensive comments in support of the rule and needs your help to further document the science and public policy reasons to not regulate biomass energy the same as fossil fuels. You can easily submit comments, either your own or suggested comments, via NAFO’s Legislative Action Center.
You may also visit NAFO’s Legislative Action Center to send letters directly to your elected officials and register to vote.
Tweet Your Support
Follow NAFO on Twitter at @nafoalliance or tweet your support with one of the below messages:
Stay Informed
Sign up to receive NAFO news releases and other valuable updates about America’s forests and the development of biomass energy. Click here to sign up.
Blog
BTEC Supports Biomass Deferral Rule
The Biomass Thermal Energy Council expressed concern over a recent lawsuit filed to overturn the EPA’s three-year deferral of the regulation of biomass carbon emissions while it conducts a scientific and policy review.
In response to the filing, BTEC’s Acting Executive Director Joseph Seymour stated: “BTEC strongly supports EPA’s thoughtful, measured approach to evaluating carbon emissions from biomass energy sources. Biomass is a renewable, carbon sequestering resource and, as such, needs to be clearly distinguished from fossil fuels in our nation’s clean air regulatory programs.” Seymour also emphasized the considerable benefits of biomass thermal energy. “Capturing and utilizing the heat from biomass combustion is, by far, the most efficient use of the resource. What’s more, thermal energy from this domestic resource can be used to heat and cool entire cities and towns, providing local jobs and utilizing locally grown, sustainable biomass feedstocks.”
Seymour concluded: “Using the legal system as a way to dismiss EPA’s review creates further uncertainty in the industry and threatens the potential capacity of biomass in contributing to our nation’s renewable energy goals.”
Read the full statement here.
read more